CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Shappa

album by Nemanja Kojić, Wikluh Sky

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ7489298 ↗
Source-derived summary

Shappa is a musical side-project of two Serbian musicians, Wikluh Sky (Bad Copy) and Coyote (Eyesburn, Burnin' Soundz), along with

King Kyll from Paris. Their debut album of the same name was released in April, 2005 by Ammonite records from Belgrade and it received positive critical notices from the media and audience. The trio had many concerts, but has paused and each member is working on his own projects.

Their music is mix of roots reggae, dancehall, nightcore, dub and hip hop.

Editorial summary

“Shappa” enters the record as album by Nemanja Kojić, Wikluh Sky. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Shappa, album and Nemanja can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2005. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Shappa, album and Nemanja.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Shappa” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Shappa, album and Nemanja provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7489298. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Shappa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Shappa primary sources, Shappa archive and Shappa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shappa”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Shappa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.