CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Shapit

1982 Indian film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ97247713
Source-derived summary

Shapit (transl. Cursed) is a Marathi-language film was released on 30 December 1982. It is produced by Madhukar Rupji, Sudha Chitale, Vinay Newalkar under the banner of Troyka Films Combine and directed by Rajdutt & Arvind Deshpande. The film won President's silver medal for Best Feature Film in Marathi at the National Film Awards.

Plot

Shapit is a movie that talks about how some people have lots of money and power while others don't have much at all. It shows how the rich often treat the poor and people from lower castes unfairly, making their lives harder. In the movie, we see how these differences in social status and money affect everyday life. It's a reminder that the world isn't always fair, and some people have more opportunities just because they were born into wealth or a higher caste. The movie shines a light on these inequalities and makes us think about how we can make things more equal for everyone.

Cast

Madhu Kambikar as Bijli

Yashwant Dutt as Bali

Nilu Phule as Rangya; Bijli's father

Kuldeep Pawar as Raosaheb Inamdar

Shahaji Kale as Shrimant Inamdar; Raosaheb's Father

Meena Naik as Raosaheb's wife

Suhas Bhalekar as Sarja

Suhas Mastakar as Birja

Ashutosh Gowariker

Mangala Sansgiri

Vanamali Nivaskar

Soundtrack

The music has been directed by Sudhir Phadke and all lyrics were written by Sudhir Moghe.

Editorial summary

“Shapit” enters the record as 1982 Indian film. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Shapit, Indian and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1982—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Shapit, Indian and film.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Shapit” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Shapit, Indian and film provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q97247713. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1982.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Shapit”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Shapit primary sources, Shapit archive and Shapit research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shapit”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Shapit” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.