CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tate–Shafarevich group

Group in arithmetic geometry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ7688027 ↗
Source-derived summary

In arithmetic geometry, the Tate–Shafarevich group Ш(A/K) of an abelian variety A (or more generally a group scheme) defined over a number field K consists of the elements of the Weil–Châtelet group

W

C

(

A

/

K

)

=

H

1

(

G

K

,

A

)

{\displaystyle \mathrm {WC} (A/K)=H^{1}(G_{K},A)}

, where

G

K

=

G

a

l

(

K

a

l

g

/

K

)

{\displaystyle G_{K}=\mathrm {Gal} (K^{alg}/K)}

is the absolute Galois group of K, that become trivial in all of the completions of K (i.e., the real and complex completions as well as the p-adic fields obtained from K by completing with respect to all its Archimedean and non Archimedean valuations v). Thus, in terms of Galois cohomology, Ш(A/K) can be defined as

⋂

v

k

e

r

(

H

1

(

G

K

,

A

)

→

H

1

(

G

K

v

,

A

v

)

)

.

{\displaystyle \bigcap _{v}\mathrm {ker} \left(H^{1}\left(G_{K},A\right)\rightarrow H^{1}\left(G_{K_{v}},A_{v}\right)\right).}

This group was introduced by Serge Lang and John Tate and Igor Shafarevich. Cassels introduced the notation Ш(A/K), where Ш is the Cyrillic letter "Sha", for Shafarevich, replacing the older notation TS or TŠ.

Elements of the Tate–Shafarevich group

Geometrically, the non-trivial elements of the Tate–Shafarevich group can be thought of as the homogeneous spaces of A that have Kv-rational points for every place v of K, but no K-rational point. Thus, the group measures the extent to which the Hasse principle fails to hold for rational equations with coefficients in the field K. Carl-Erik Lind gave an example of such a homogeneous space, by showing that the genus 1 curve x4 − 17 = 2y2 has solutions over the reals and over all p-adic fields, but has no rational points.

Ernst S. Selmer gave many more examples, such as 3x3 + 4y3 + 5z3 = 0.

The special case of the Tate–Shafarevich group for the finite group scheme consisting of points of some given finite order n of an abelian variety is closely related to the Selmer group.

Tate–Shafarevich conjecture

The Tate–Shafarevich conjecture states that the Tate–Shafarevich group is finite. Karl Rubin proved this for some elliptic curves of rank at most 1 with complex multiplication. Victor A. Kolyvagin extended this to modular elliptic curves over the rationals of analytic rank at most 1.

Editorial summary

“Tate–Shafarevich group” enters the record as group in arithmetic geometry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tate, Shafarevich and group can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 386-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tate, Shafarevich and group.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tate–Shafarevich group” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tate, Shafarevich and group provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7688027. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tate–Shafarevich group”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tate–Shafarevich group primary sources, Tate–Shafarevich group archive and Tate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tate–Shafarevich group”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tate–Shafarevich group” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.