CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mia Davies shadow ministry

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ116745323 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Davies shadow ministry was the shadow ministry led by Mia Davies in the Parliament of Western Australia.

Ministry

Following the 2021 election, the Liberal Party and Nationals Party entered into a formal alliance to form opposition, with National Party being the senior party and the Liberal Party being the junior party in the alliance. Shadow ministerial positions were also held by parliamentary members of both parties. This was similar to the agreements between both parties when they were in government following the 2008 and 2013 elections. Similar to the 2008 and 2013 agreements, the deputy leader of the senior party, Nationals deputy leader Shane Love, was the deputy opposition leader, instead of the leader of the junior party, Liberal Party leader David Honey. Under the alliance, each party maintained their independence, and could speak out on issues when there was a disagreement with their partner.

Former members

Vince Catania and James Hayward were members of the Shadow Cabinet following the 2021 election. In December 2021, Hayward resigned from the National Party following him being charged with child sex offences. In June 2022, Catania announced his intention to resign from parliament in August to spend more time with his family. He tendered his resignation to the speaker on 8 August.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mia Davies shadow ministry” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Davies, shadow and ministry.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 2008, 2013, 2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2021-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Davies, shadow and ministry providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mia Davies shadow ministry”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116745323. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021, 2008, 2013 and 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mia Davies shadow ministry”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mia Davies shadow ministry primary sources, Mia Davies shadow ministry archive and Davies research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mia Davies shadow ministry”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mia Davies shadow ministry” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.