CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Sfida Setagaya FC

Japanese women's association football club

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ724507 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sfida Setagaya F.C. (スフィーダ世田谷F.C., Sufīda Setagaya Efu Shī) is a women's football club based in Setagaya, Tokyo. The club currently play in Nadeshiko League, Japan's second tier of women football league.

Squad

Current squad

As of 21 October 2022

Note: Flags indicate national team as defined under FIFA eligibility rules; some limited exceptions apply. Players may hold more than one non-FIFA nationality.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Sfida Setagaya FC” as japanese women's association football club. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2001. The account is most persuasive where Sfida, Setagaya and Japanese can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as japanese women's association football club. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q724507. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sfida Setagaya FC”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sfida Setagaya FC primary sources, Sfida Setagaya FC archive and Sfida research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sfida Setagaya FC”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sfida Setagaya FC” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.