Seventy-Two Virgins
2004 comic political novel written by Boris Johnson
Seventy-Two Virgins: A Comedy of Errors is a 2004 novel by Boris Johnson. It received mixed reviews on original release.
Plot
The President of the United States plans to visit the Palace of Westminster. A Lebanese-born terrorist aims to assassinate him; Roger Barlow, a hapless, bicycle-riding, tousled-haired MP aims to foil the attack in order to distract from a scandal involving his financial entanglement in a lingerie shop named Eulalie.
Title
The title is a reference to the Islamophobic trope about "72 virgins" being the main motive of Muslim men who are willing to die in acts of warfare or political violence, a concept that does not appear in the Quran. The trope is often claimed to be supported by an obscure Central Asian hadith about houris in paradise. The "72 virgins" translation of that hadith possibly originates from a "war on terror" era American English translation of that hadith being quoted in a 1996 anti-American manifesto by Osama bin Laden.
Since then it has become an extremely widespread Islamophobic trope.
Reception
Seventy-Two Virgins received mixed reviews on original release. David Smith, writing for The Observer, said "despite the pacy narration, there is a sense of going nowhere fast", but praised the humour, saying "Yet while Johnson is a heroic failure as a novelist, he scores in his comic handling of those most sensitive issues: the ideological motives of Muslim suicide bombers (whence the title) and the mixed blessings of the American empire.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Seventy-Two Virgins” as 2004 comic political novel written by Boris Johnson. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as 2004 comic political novel written by Boris Johnson. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q78628309. VIAF identifies the subject as 220152502872510800004. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004 and 1996.
Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Seventy-Two Virgins”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Seventy-Two Virgins primary sources, Seventy-Two Virgins archive and Seventy-Two research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Seventy-Two Virgins”?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Seventy-Two Virgins” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.