Seventeen Rules of Enjuin
Open-knowledge reference entry
The Seventeen Rules of Enjuin (延寿院医則十七ヶ条) are a code of conduct developed for students of the Japanese Ri-shu school of medicine in the 16th century CE. They contain the same number of precepts as the Seventeen-article constitution of Prince Shōtoku.
The rules are similar to the Vejjavatapada, the Buddhist medical doctor's oath, the Oath of Asaph and the Hippocratic Oath, in that they stress the rights of the physicians' teachers, require the physician to respect the patient's privacy rights, and prohibit both euthanasia and abortion. They also emphasize that physicians should love their patients and that they should work together as a brotherhood.
The Seventeen Rules
Source:
1) Each person should follow the path designated by Heaven (Buddha, the Gods).
2) You should always be kind to people. You should always be devoted to loving people.
3) The teaching of Medicine should be restricted to selected persons.
4) You should not tell others what you are taught, regarding treatments without permission.
5) You should not establish association with doctors who do not belong to this school.
6) All the successors and descendants of the disciples of this school shall follow the teachers' ways.
“Seventeen Rules of Enjuin” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Seventeen, Rules and Enjuin can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Seventeen Rules of Enjuin” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Seventeen, Rules and Enjuin provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7457639. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Seventeen Rules of Enjuin”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Seventeen Rules of Enjuin primary sources, Seventeen Rules of Enjuin archive and Seventeen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Seventeen Rules of Enjuin”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Seventeen Rules of Enjuin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.