Enneagram of Personality
typology of human personality, based on the teachings of Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo and popularized in the 1970s in the U.S.

The Enneagram of Personality, or simply the Enneagram, is a pseudoscientific model of the human psyche primarily understood and taught as a typology of nine interconnected personality types.
The historical origins of the ideas underlying the Enneagram of Personality remain a subject of debate. Contemporary approaches heavily derive from the teachings of Bolivian psycho-spiritual teacher Oscar Ichazo in the 1950s and Chilean psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo in the 1970s. Naranjo's theories were also shaped by earlier personality teachings developed by George Gurdjieff and the Fourth Way tradition during the first half of the 20th century.
As a typology, the Enneagram outlines nine distinct personality types (sometimes also referred to as "enneatypes"). These types are mapped onto the points of a geometric figure known as an enneagram, which illustrates the principal connections between them. Various schools of thought exist among Enneagram educators, leading to many different interpretations of the system.
The Enneagram of Personality is widely marketed in both business management and spirituality contexts across various media, including seminars, conferences, books, magazines, and DVDs. In the corporate world, it is often used as a tool for gaining insight into workplace interpersonal dynamics. In spiritual settings, it is commonly presented as a pathway to higher states of enlightenment and essence.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Enneagram of Personality” is typology of human personality, based on the teachings of Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo and popularized in the 1970s in the U.S. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Enneagram, Personality and typology, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “typology of human personality, based on the teachings of Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo and popularized in the 1970s in the U.S” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q273047. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Enneagram of Personality”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Enneagram of Personality primary sources, Enneagram of Personality archive and Enneagram research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Enneagram of Personality”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Enneagram of Personality” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.