Setiabudi 13 case
unsolved Indonesian cold case

The Setiabudi 13 case (Indonesian: Kasus Setiabudi 13) is a cold case of unsolved murder of an unidentified mutilated man found on 23 November 1981 on the sidewalk of Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Setiabudi, South Jakarta. Due to the extreme violence and uncertainty of the case, this case is considered as the first mutilation case in modern Indonesian crime history, one of the most gruesome, and one of the most mysterious cases in Indonesia. The case is called "Setiabudi 13" since the mutilated body was found in 13 pieces and was found in Setiabudi district, South Jakarta.
Mun'im Idris, a forensic expert who performed the autopsy of the body, said that it was the most brutal, vicious, and the most haunting case he had ever handled. According to Idris, this gruesome case is very disturbing, because despite there were plenty of forensic clues, e.g. victim's fingerprints and face was quite intact and it should be identifiable, the police has been unable to uncover the victim's identity.
Chronology
In the morning of 23 November 1981, two security guards of PT Garuda Mataram Motor found two cardboard boxes on the sidewalk of Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Setiabudi, South Jakarta, right across Wisma Arthaloka building (today Bank Muamalat building). The two cardboard boxes attracted the attention of the two security guards because the boxes emanated a foul stench and was surrounded by flies. The two security guards immediately reported the discovery of the suspicious cardboard boxes to a policeman who was directing the traffic nearby. However, because the policeman was busy, this report was ignored.
“Setiabudi 13 case” enters the record as unsolved Indonesian cold case. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Setiabudi, case and unsolved can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Setiabudi 13 case” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Setiabudi, case and unsolved provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 16, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q97212954. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Setiabudi 13 case”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Setiabudi 13 case primary sources, Setiabudi 13 case archive and Setiabudi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Setiabudi 13 case”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Setiabudi 13 case” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.