CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Serrata del Maggior Consiglio

Constitutional process in medieval Venice

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ3957986 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Great Council Lockout (Italian: Serrata del Maggior Consiglio) was a constitutional process, started with a 1297 ordinance, by means of which membership of the Great Council of Venice became hereditary. Since it was the Great Council that had the right to elect the Doge, the 1297 ordinance marked a significant change in the constitution of the Republic. This resulted in the exclusion of minor aristocrats and plebeians from participating in the government of the Republic. Although formerly provisional, the ordinance later became a permanent act, and since that time it was disregarded only at times of political or financial crisis (e.g. after the war against the League of Cambrai).

History

Historical background

When the Commonwealth of Venice was formed, the Doge was assisted by a Council of Wise Men (Consilium Sapientium) elected by the people's assembly (Concio). Once it obtained sovereign power in 1172, the Council came to be known as Great Council. It originally functioned as an extension of the people's assembly, and its members were elected on a yearly basis, with the general election usually falling on the day of Saint Michael (29 September). Later, in 1207 the election system was changed; the Concio was required to elect three representatives (up to seven since 1230), who had the duty to nominate the Councillors.

Over the years, the Great Council became the bone of contention between the people's party, which aimed to preserve the status quo, and the aristocratic party, which aimed to exclude up-starts from the government.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Serrata del Maggior Consiglio” is constitutional process in medieval Venice. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Serrata, Maggior and Consiglio, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1297, 1172, 1207, 1230—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1297-02-28. For this dossier, Serrata, Maggior and Consiglio is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “constitutional process in medieval Venice” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3957986. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1297, 1172, 1207 and 1230.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Serrata del Maggior Consiglio”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Serrata del Maggior Consiglio primary sources, Serrata del Maggior Consiglio archive and Serrata research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Serrata del Maggior Consiglio”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Serrata del Maggior Consiglio” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.