CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Seringia × katatona

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ51046936 ↗
Source-derived summary

Seringia × katatona, commonly known as red dune fire-bush, is a species of flowering plant in the mallow family and is endemic to northern Western Australia. It is an erect, compact, suckering shrub, with hairy young branches, egg-shaped to elliptic leaves and purple flowers arranged in groups of 9 to 17.

Description

Seringia × katatona is an erect, compact shrub with many stems, and that typically grows up to 0.5–1.0 m (1 ft 8 in – 3 ft 3 in) high, 1 m (3 ft 3 in) wide, and sometimes forms suckers. The leaves are arranged alternately, at first trilobed or egg-shaped, about 35 mm (1.4 in) long and 18 mm (0.71 in) wide, later oblong, 12–28 mm (0.47–1.10 in) long and 6–10 mm (0.24–0.39 in) wide on a petiole 2.5–6 mm (0.098–0.236 in) long with narrowly egg-shaped stipules 2.0–4.5 mm (0.079–0.177 in) long at the base. The flowers are arranged in a cyme 9–17 mm (0.35–0.67 in) long with 9 to 17 flowers on a peduncle 3–7 mm (0.12–0.28 in) long, each flower on a pedicel 7–11 mm (0.28–0.43 in) long. The flowers are purple with petal-like, broadly egg-shaped sepals 7–9 mm (0.28–0.35 in) and joined at the base to form a tube with lobes half the length of the tube. Petals are absent, the staminodes tiny, and the filaments and anthers are yellow. Flowering occurs from March to August.

Taxonomy

In 1999, Carolyn F. Wilkins described Keraudrenia katatona in the journal Nuytsia from specimens collected near the Broome airport in 1995. In 2016, Wilkins and Barbara Ann Whitlock changed the name to Seringia × katatona in Australian Systematic Botany.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Seringia × katatona” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Seringia, katatona and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999, 1995, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Seringia, katatona and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Seringia × katatona”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q51046936. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999, 1995 and 2016.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Seringia × katatona”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Seringia × katatona primary sources, Seringia × katatona archive and Seringia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Seringia × katatona”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Seringia × katatona” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.