Bible translations into Native American languages
Open-knowledge reference entry

Biblical translations into the indigenous languages of North and South America have been produced since the 16th century.
Algonquian languages
Abenaki
Mark, translated by Peter Wzokhilain, was printed in 1830. It was republished in 2011 by Jesse Bruchac.
Anishinaabemowin
Algonquin
Roger and Ruth Spielmann of Wycliffe Bible Translators together with local Algonquin people, translated a new translation into modern Algonquin. John was published in 1993. The complete New Testament was published in 1998.
Massachusett
The Eliot Indian Bible was produced in 1663 by Puritan missionary John Eliot. Mamusse Wunneetupanatamwe Up Biblum God on the cover page of the translated Bible means The Whole Holy His-Bible God, both Old Testament and also New Testament. It is a complete a translation of all 66 books (Old Testament and New Testament) in the Geneva Bible into the indigenous Massachusett language.
Ojibwa
The first portion of the Bible in Ojibwa, part of the Algonquian language family in Canada, was the Gospels of St Matthew and St John, translated by Peter and John Jones and printed in 1829-31.
“Bible translations into Native American languages” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bible, translations and Native can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Bible translations into Native American languages” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bible, translations and Native provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4903201. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1830, 2011, 1993 and 1998.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Bible translations into Native American languages”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Bible translations into Native American languages primary sources, Bible translations into Native American languages archive and Bible research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bible translations into Native American languages”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Bible translations into Native American languages” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.