Serbia 21
liberal political party in Serbia
Serbia 21 (Serbian Cyrillic: Србија 21, romanised: Srbija 21, abbr. S21) was a political organisation in Serbia. It was founded in early 2020 by former members of the Social Democratic Party (SDS) and Democratic Party (DS).
History
Marko Đurišić and Nenad Konstantinović were previously a part of the Social Democratic Party (SDS) but after the party stated that they will boycott the upcoming elections they decided to create a new political organisation which will participate in the next elections and which will also focus on the Serbian accession to the European Union. After some time they were also supported by Gordana Čomić of the Democratic Party (DS). The party participated in the 2020 parliamentary election, and they stated multiple times that "it is only possible to change the system and to remove Vučić from power if we participate in the elections". Boris Tadić, the president of the Social Democratic Party, has classified the organisation as "Vučić's project". By the time of the election, the organisation had two MPs and a joint parliamentary group with Vojvodina Front.
They were also a part of the United Democratic Serbia (UDS) coalition, together with Party of Modern Serbia (SMS), League of Social Democrats of Vojvodina (LSV)-led Vojvodina Front and the Civic Democratic Forum (GDF). The organisation has remained inactive since the 2020 parliamentary election.
The public source identifies “Serbia 21” as liberal political party in Serbia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Serbia, liberal and political.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Serbia 21”, the useful work is to connect “liberal political party in Serbia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q96405318. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Serbia 21”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Serbia 21 primary sources, Serbia 21 archive and Serbia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Serbia 21”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Serbia 21” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.