CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Senegalese Red Cross Society

National Red Cross Society in Senegal

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ3003248
Source-derived summary

Senegalese Red Cross Society (French: Croix-Rouge sénégalaise) was established by decree in 1962. It has its headquarters in Dakar.

Despite being a Muslim majority nation, it uses the Red Cross as its symbol for the society.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Senegalese Red Cross Society” as national Red Cross Society in Senegal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1962—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1963-01-29. The account is most persuasive where Senegalese, Cross and Society can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as national Red Cross Society in Senegal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3003248. VIAF identifies the subject as 44147663125060552645. The Library of Congress control number is no2016134204. Authority coordinates are 14.662, -17.442. 2 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1962.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Senegalese Red Cross Society”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Senegalese Red Cross Society primary sources, Senegalese Red Cross Society archive and Senegalese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Senegalese Red Cross Society”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Senegalese Red Cross Society” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.