CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Senate Constituency no. 42

parliamentary constituency in Poland

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ11797384 ↗
Source-derived summary

Senate Constituency no. 42 (Polish: Okręg wyborczy nr 42 do Senatu) is a single-member constituency for the Senate of Poland comprising five districts of the city of Warsaw: Praga-Południe, Praga-Północ, Rembertów, Targówek, Wesoła. The incumbent senator is Marek Borowski (Civic Platform) elected in 2023 parliamentary election. He has held the seat for four terms in a row since the constituency was established in 2011.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Senate Constituency no. 42” as parliamentary constituency in Poland. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023, 2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Senate, Constituency and parliamentary can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as parliamentary constituency in Poland. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11797384. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023 and 2011.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Senate Constituency no. 42”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Senate Constituency no. 42 primary sources, Senate Constituency no. 42 archive and Senate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Senate Constituency no. 42”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Senate Constituency no. 42” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.