Involution (mathematics)
function that is its own inverse

In mathematics, an involution, involutory function, or self-inverse function is a function f that is its own inverse, f(f(x)) = x
for all x in the domain of f. Equivalently, applying f twice produces the original value.
General properties
Any involution is a bijection.
The identity map is a trivial example of an involution. Examples of nontrivial involutions include negation (x ↦ −x), reciprocation (x ↦ 1/x), and complex conjugation (z ↦ z) in arithmetic; reflection, half-turn rotation, and circle inversion in geometry; complementation in set theory; and reciprocal ciphers such as the ROT13 transformation and the Beaufort polyalphabetic cipher.
The composition g ∘ f of two involutions f and g is an involution if and only if they commute: g ∘ f = f ∘ g.
Involutions on finite sets
The number of involutions, including the identity involution, on a set with n = 0, 1, 2, ... elements is given by a recurrence relation found by Heinrich August Rothe in 1800:
a
0
=
a
1
=
1
{\displaystyle a_{0}=a_{1}=1}
and
a
n
=
a
n
−
1
+
(
n
−
1
)
a
n
−
2
{\displaystyle a_{n}=a_{n-1}+(n-1)a_{n-2}}
for
n
>
1.
{\displaystyle n>1.}
The first few terms of this sequence are 1, 1, 2, 4, 10, 26, 76, 232 (sequence A000085 in the OEIS); these numbers are called the telephone numbers, and they also count the number of Young tableaux with a given number of cells.
The number an can also be expressed by non-recursive formulas, such as the sum
a
n
=
∑
m
=
0
⌊
n
2
⌋
n
!
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Involution (mathematics)” is function that is its own inverse. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Involution, mathematics and function, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “function that is its own inverse” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q846862. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1800.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Involution (mathematics)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Involution (mathematics) primary sources, Involution (mathematics) archive and Involution research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Involution (mathematics)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Involution (mathematics)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.