CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Wrack (seaweed)

list of plants with the same or similar names

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ8037540
Source-derived summary

Wrack is part of the common names of several species of seaweed in the family Fucaceae. It may also refer more generally to any seaweeds or seagrasses that wash up on beaches and may accumulate in the wrack zone.

It consists largely of species of Fucus — brown algae with flat branched ribbon-like fronds, characterized in F. serratus by a saw-toothed margin and in F. vesiculosus, another common species, by bearing air-bladders. Another component of sea wrack may be seagrasses such as Zostera marina a marine flowering plant with bright green long narrow grass-like leaves. Posidonia australis, which occurs sub-tidally on the southern coasts of Australia, sheds its older ribbon-like leaf blades in winter, resulting in thick accumulations along more sheltered shorelines.

"Bladder wrack", Fucus vesiculosus

"Channelled wrack", Pelvetia canaliculata

"Knotted wrack", Ascophyllum nodosum

"Spiral wrack" or "flat wrack", Fucus spiralis

"Toothed wrack" or "serrated wrack", Fucus serratus

Historically wrack was used for making manure, and for making "kelp", a form of potash.

The word's origin is possibly from M Dutch 'wrak', from its root - to push, to shove, to drive.

In the case of seaweed, its sense is in a possible derivation of the word wreck - cast up on shore.

References

This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Wrack (seaweed)” as list of plants with the same or similar names. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1911—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Wrack, seaweed and list can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as list of plants with the same or similar names. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8037540. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1911.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wrack (seaweed)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wrack (seaweed) primary sources, Wrack (seaweed) archive and Wrack research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wrack (seaweed)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Wrack (seaweed)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.