CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Scotts Run

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ48773858
Source-derived summary

Scotts Run, formerly Scotts Run Station, is a mixed-use development featuring offices, apartments, hotels, retail stores, and restaurants in Tysons, Virginia being developed by Cityline Partners, LLC.

Description

Scotts Run is split into two sections, Scotts Run South and Scotts Run North, on both sides of Dolley Madison Boulevard between the interchanges with I-495 and SR 267 in the Tysons East section of Tysons, Virginia. It is adjacent to the Washington Metro McLean station on the south and east sides of the station. The development is also split from north to south by the Scotts Run Stream Valley Park. Expected square footage of the developments are 1,500,000 square feet (140,000 m2) on 9.4 acres (3.8 ha) in Scotts Run North and 6,600,000 square feet (610,000 m2) on 36 acres (15 ha) in Scotts Run South.

Scotts Run Station will include up to two dozen buildings, 7 in the north and 17 in the south. Several of these buildings will be over 300 feet (91 m) in height.

History

Originally proposed in 2011 as "Scotts Run Station", Scotts Run was intended to leverage the Tysons Comprehensive Plan to establish a large, mixed-use neighborhood similar to Reston Town Center. The project was later split into two separate sections, "Scotts Run Station South" and "Scotts Run Station North" and the "Station" portion was dropped from both names. The south section was approved by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors in 2012 while the north section was put on hold. While work on the initial buildings on the south section started, the north section was converted to a parking lot to support the newly opened McLean station.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Scotts Run” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Scotts, Open-knowledge and entry can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q48773858. Authority coordinates are 38.925, -77.208. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 2012.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Scotts Run”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Scotts Run primary sources, Scotts Run archive and Scotts research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Scotts Run”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Scotts Run” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.