CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Science of Love

television series

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ7433699
Source-derived summary

Science of Love: A Modern Dating Experiment is an NBC reality dating special hosted by Mark Consuelos and starring NFL football player Adam Johnson. The show was produced by 3 Ball Productions and Joke Productions. It premiered on Monday, June 25, 2007.

The one-hour TV special explored whether science could offer a method of achieving love, and pitted experimental methods against a more instinctual approach.

After choosing a woman he was initially attracted to, Adam was then presented with a date chosen by him for science. After dating both, Adam had to choose whether or not he wanted to continue with the woman he originally chose, or the option presented to him by science.

On the special, the scientific match, Casey Dee, won Adam's heart. As a prize, the two were flown to Hawaii.

Editorial summary

“Science of Love” enters the record as television series. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Science, Love and television can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Science, Love and television.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Science of Love” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Science, Love and television provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7433699. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Science of Love”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Science of Love primary sources, Science of Love archive and Science research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Science of Love”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Science of Love” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.