Monoid factorisation
Open-knowledge reference entry

In mathematics, a factorisation of a free monoid is a sequence of subsets of words with the property that every word in the free monoid can be written as a concatenation of elements drawn from the subsets. The Chen–Fox–Lyndon theorem states that the Lyndon words furnish a factorisation. The Schützenberger theorem relates the definition in terms of a multiplicative property to an additive property.
Let A∗ be the free monoid on an alphabet A. Let Xi be a sequence of subsets of A∗ indexed by a totally ordered index set I. A factorisation of a word w in A∗ is an expression
w
=
x
i
1
x
i
2
⋯
x
i
n
{\displaystyle w=x_{i_{1}}x_{i_{2}}\cdots x_{i_{n}}\ }
with
x
i
j
∈
X
i
j
{\displaystyle x_{i_{j}}\in X_{i_{j}}}
and
i
1
≥
i
2
≥
…
≥
i
n
{\displaystyle i_{1}\geq i_{2}\geq \ldots \geq i_{n}}
. Some authors reverse the order of the inequalities.
Chen–Fox–Lyndon theorem
A Lyndon word over a totally ordered alphabet A is a word that is lexicographically less than all its rotations. The Chen–Fox–Lyndon theorem states that every string may be formed in a unique way by concatenating a lexicographically non-increasing sequence of Lyndon words. Hence taking Xl to be the singleton set {l} for each Lyndon word l, with the index set L of Lyndon words ordered lexicographically, we obtain a factorisation of A∗. Such a factorisation can be found in linear time and constant space by Duval's algorithm. The algorithm in Python code is:
Hall words
The Hall set provides a factorization.
“Monoid factorisation” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Monoid, factorisation and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Monoid factorisation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Monoid, factorisation and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 1, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6901638. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Monoid factorisation”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Monoid factorisation primary sources, Monoid factorisation archive and Monoid research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monoid factorisation”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Monoid factorisation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.