Schröder–Bernstein theorem
theorem that, if there exist injective functions in both directions between two sets, then there exists a bijection between them

In set theory, the Schröder–Bernstein theorem states that, if there exist injective functions f : A → B and g : B → A between the sets A and B, then there exists a bijective function h : A → B.
In terms of the cardinality of the two sets, this classically implies that if |A| ≤ |B| and |B| ≤ |A|, then |A| = |B|; that is, A and B are equipotent. This is a useful feature in the ordering of cardinal numbers.
The theorem is named after Ernst Schröder and Felix Bernstein. It is also known as the Cantor–Bernstein theorem or Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein theorem, after Georg Cantor, who first published it (albeit without proof).
Proof
The following proof is attributed to Julius König.
Assume without loss of generality that A and B are disjoint. For any a in A or b in B we can form a unique two-sided sequence of elements that are alternately in A and B, by repeatedly applying
f
{\displaystyle f}
and
g
−
1
{\displaystyle g^{-1}}
to go from A to B and
g
{\displaystyle g}
and
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
to go from B to A (where defined; the inverses
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
and
g
−
1
{\displaystyle g^{-1}}
are understood as partial functions.)
⋯
→
f
−
1
(
g
−
1
(
a
)
)
→
g
−
1
(
a
)
→
a
→
f
(
a
)
→
g
(
f
(
a
)
)
→
⋯
{\displaystyle \cdots \rightarrow f^{-1}(g^{-1}(a))\rightarrow g^{-1}(a)\rightarrow a\rightarrow f(a)\rightarrow g(f(a))\rightarrow \cdots }
For any particular a, this sequence may terminate to the left or not, at a point where
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
or
g
−
1
{\displaystyle g^{-1}}
is not defined.
By the fact that
f
{\displaystyle f}
and
g
{\displaystyle g}
are injective functions, each a in A and b in B is in exactly one such sequence to within identity: if an element occurs in two sequences, all elements to the left and to the right must be the same in both, by the definition of the sequences. Therefore, the sequences form a partition of the (disjoint) union of A and B. Hence it suffices to produce a bijection between the elements of A and B in each of the sequences separately, as follows:
Call a sequence an A-stopper if it stops at an element of A, or a B-stopper if it stops at an element of B. Otherwise, call it doubly infinite if all the elements are distinct or cyclic if it repeats. See the picture for examples.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Schröder–Bernstein theorem” as theorem that, if there exist injective functions in both directions between two sets, then there exists a bijection between them. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as theorem that, if there exist injective functions in both directions between two sets, then there exists a bijection between them. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1033910. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Schröder–Bernstein theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Schröder–Bernstein theorem primary sources, Schröder–Bernstein theorem archive and Schröder research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Schröder–Bernstein theorem”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Schröder–Bernstein theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.