CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Schöllkrippen

market municipality of Germany

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ520820 ↗
Source-derived summary

Schöllkrippen (German pronunciation: [ˈʃœlkʁɪpn̩]) is a market municipality in the Aschaffenburg district in the Regierungsbezirk of Lower Franconia (Unterfranken) in Bavaria, Germany and seat of the Verwaltungsgemeinschaft (municipal association) of Schöllkrippen. It had a total population of around 4,300 in 2020, and experienced a decrease down to 4112 in 2023

Geography

Location

Schöllkrippen is the largest settlement of the Kahlgrund and lies on the river Kahl on the western edge of the Spessart (range). The main Ortsteil of Schöllkrippen lies at the foot of the Reuschberg.

Subdivisions

Schöllkrippen's Ortsteile are Schöllkrippen, Schneppenbach and Hofstädten.

Schöllkrippen Ortsteil consists of the following Orte: Ernstkirchen, Langenborn, Reuschberg, Röderhof, Schabernack and Schöllkrippen proper.

Neighbouring municipalities

The neighbouring municipalities are from the north (clockwise): Westerngrund, Kleinkahl, Schöllkrippener Forst (an unincorporated area), Sommerkahl, Blankenbach, Krombach and Geiselbach.

History

Schöllkrippen has long been the central settlement of the Upper Kahlgrund and a meeting point of roads at least since the Middle Ages. Old long distance trade routes such as the Birkenhainer Straße and the Eselsweg pass nearby.

What had in the past been considered a prehistoric Celtic circular rampart, the Alte Burg or Altenburg on the nearby Reuschberg, is now thought to date to medieval times.

The church St.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Schöllkrippen” as market municipality of Germany. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Schöllkrippen, market and municipality can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as market municipality of Germany. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q520820. VIAF identifies the subject as 148438787. The Library of Congress control number is n82162947. Authority coordinates are 50.085, 9.246. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020 and 2023.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Schöllkrippen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Schöllkrippen primary sources, Schöllkrippen archive and Schöllkrippen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Schöllkrippen”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Schöllkrippen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.