CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Schmidtsche Schack

German manufacturing company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ62760413 ↗
Source-derived summary

Schmidtsche Schack - ARVOS is a German enterprise with headquarters and fabrication facilities in Kassel. The company also operates a branch office in Düsseldorf and has affiliated units in the US, Japan, and Singapore.

It originates from Schmidt’sche Heissdampf-Gesellschaft mbH, which was founded by Wilhelm Schmidt in 1910. The firm belongs to the ARVOS Group and is a world leader in process gas cooling systems for the chemical, petrochemical, and metallurgical industries. In the fiscal year 2018, the sales figure amounted to approximately 335 million euros.

History

Company history in the 19th century

In 1880, before the company Schmidt’sche Heissdampf-Gesellschaft was founded, the engineer Wilhelm Schmidt had begun developing steam engines. In 1887 he sold the first patented licence for a hot steamship engine to the German shipbuilders Blohm+Voss in Hamburg. Three years later, businesses with patented licences for hot steam technology began to flourish. In 1895, Wilhelm Schmidt acquired the majority share of Ascherslebener Maschinenfabrik, which was converted into a joint stock company in 1898, of which Schmidt took over a mandate in the supervisory board. The first two hot steam locomotives equipped with the Schmidt’sche superheater system were delivered to the Preußische Eisenbahngesellschaft (German railway company) via Vulkan AG Stettin, and Henschel & Son in Kassel.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Schmidtsche Schack” as german manufacturing company. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Schmidtsche, Schack and German.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1910, 2018, 1880, 1887—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Schmidtsche, Schack and German providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Schmidtsche Schack”, the useful work is to connect “german manufacturing company” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62760413. VIAF identifies the subject as 4629156317462202350000. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1910, 2018, 1880 and 1887.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Schmidtsche Schack”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Schmidtsche Schack primary sources, Schmidtsche Schack archive and Schmidtsche research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Schmidtsche Schack”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Schmidtsche Schack” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.