Robinson–Schensted correspondence
bijection between permutations and pairs of standard Young tableaux

In mathematics, the Robinson–Schensted correspondence is a bijective correspondence between permutations and pairs of standard Young tableaux of the same shape. It has various descriptions, all of which are of algorithmic nature, it has many remarkable properties, and it has applications in combinatorics and other areas such as representation theory. The correspondence has been generalized in numerous ways, notably by Knuth to what is known as the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth correspondence, and a further generalization to pictures by Zelevinsky.
The simplest description of the correspondence is using the Schensted algorithm (Schensted 1961), a procedure that constructs one tableau by successively inserting the values of the permutation according to a specific rule, while the other tableau records the evolution of the shape during construction. The correspondence had been described, in a rather different form, much earlier by Robinson (Robinson 1938), in an attempt to prove the Littlewood–Richardson rule. The correspondence is often referred to as the Robinson–Schensted algorithm, although the procedure used by Robinson is radically different from the Schensted algorithm, and almost entirely forgotten. Other methods of defining the correspondence include a nondeterministic algorithm in terms of jeu de taquin.
The bijective nature of the correspondence relates it to the enumerative identity
∑
λ
∈
P
n
(
t
λ
)
2
=
n
!
{\displaystyle \sum _{\lambda \in {\mathcal {P}}_{n}}(t_{\lambda })^{2}=n!}
where
P
n
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}_{n}}
denotes the set of partitions of n (or of Young diagrams with n squares), and tλ denotes the number of standard Young tableaux of shape λ.
The Schensted algorithm
The Schensted algorithm starts from the permutation σ written in two-line notation
σ
=
(
1
2
3
⋯
n
σ
1
σ
2
σ
3
⋯
σ
n
)
{\displaystyle \sigma ={\begin{pmatrix}1&2&3&\cdots &n\\\sigma _{1}&\sigma _{2}&\sigma _{3}&\cdots &\sigma _{n}\end{pmatrix}}}
where σi = σ(i), and proceeds by constructing sequentially a sequence of (intermediate) ordered pairs of Young tableaux of the same shape:
(
P
0
,
Q
0
)
,
(
P
1
,
Q
1
)
,
…
,
(
P
n
,
Q
n
)
,
{\displaystyle (P_{0},Q_{0}),(P_{1},Q_{1}),\ldots ,(P_{n},Q_{n}),}
where P0 = Q0 are empty tableaux.
The public source identifies “Robinson–Schensted correspondence” as bijection between permutations and pairs of standard Young tableaux. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Robinson, Schensted and correspondence.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Robinson–Schensted correspondence”, the useful work is to connect “bijection between permutations and pairs of standard Young tableaux” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2997917. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1961 and 1938.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Robinson–Schensted correspondence”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Robinson–Schensted correspondence primary sources, Robinson–Schensted correspondence archive and Robinson research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Robinson–Schensted correspondence”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Robinson–Schensted correspondence” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.