CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2016 clown sightings

2016 clown sightings were reports of people disguised as clowns

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ27150058 ↗
Source-derived summary

In 2016, there were reports of people disguised as evil clowns in incongruous settings, such as near forests, schools and neighborhoods. The incidents were reported in the United States, Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and subsequently in other countries and territories, starting in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on August 1, 2016, and continuing in other countries for the rest of August 2016. The Green Bay sighting was first reported on Facebook at around 2 AM local time and was later revealed to have been a marketing stunt for a horror film. The phenomenon later spread to many other cities in the United States. By mid-October 2016, clown sightings and attacks had been reported in nearly all U.S. states, nine out of 13 provinces and territories of Canada, and 18 other countries.

Prior to the spate of incidents in 2016, numerous sightings of people dressed as clowns in odd or incongruous settings had occurred throughout the world since 2013. The proliferation of videos and images of these precursor sightings spread through social media posts and viral sharing of the content.

Scope, timeline and effects of sightings

Precursor sightings

One possible precursor event were the 2013 sightings of a "creepy clown" in Northampton, England. The Northampton clown sightings, which were in the town during September and October 2013, were the work of three local filmmakers: Alex Powell, Elliot Simpson, and Luke Ubanski. The clown resembled Pennywise from Stephen King's novel It.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2016 clown sightings” is 2016 clown sightings were reports of people disguised as clowns. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through clown, sightings and reports, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, clown, sightings and reports is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2016 clown sightings were reports of people disguised as clowns” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27150058. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2016 clown sightings”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2016 clown sightings primary sources, 2016 clown sightings archive and clown research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016 clown sightings”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2016 clown sightings” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.