CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Scarlet Moon de Chevalier

Brazilian journalist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ13593797 ↗
Source-derived summary

Scarlet Moon de Chevalier (12 September 1950 – 5 June 2013) was a Brazilian actress, journalist, and writer who died of multiple system atrophy on 5 June 2013 at the age of 62. She was married to singer Lulu Santos for 28 years.

Editorial summary

“Scarlet Moon de Chevalier” enters the record as brazilian journalist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Scarlet, Moon and Chevalier can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1950, 2013—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1950-09-05, 1950-09-12—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Scarlet, Moon and Chevalier.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Scarlet Moon de Chevalier” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Scarlet, Moon and Chevalier provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13593797. VIAF identifies the subject as 70168951. The Library of Congress control number is n00900790. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1950 and 2013.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Scarlet Moon de Chevalier”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Scarlet Moon de Chevalier primary sources, Scarlet Moon de Chevalier archive and Scarlet research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Scarlet Moon de Chevalier”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Scarlet Moon de Chevalier” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.