CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of mais of Kanem–Bornu

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ134996027 ↗
Source-derived summary

The mai (sometimes equated to king or emperor) was the monarch of the Kanem–Bornu Empire from the foundation of the empire in the 8th century to the abolition of the office in the mid-19th century. From the conversion to Islam in the 11th century and onwards, the mai sometimes adopted additional titles, such as emir, sultan, or caliph. The last mai, Ali V Minargema, was killed in 1846, whereafter the empire was ruled by the shehus.

Records of the mais generally distinguish between an earlier Duguwa dynasty (8th–11th century) and a later Sayfawa dynasty (11th–19th century) but it is unclear whether this distinction is rooted in an actual change in royal lineage or the result of some other factor. The line of rulers is reconstructed by scholars through orally recited sources such as the girgam (the empire's royal chronicle), surviving literary sources, and contemporary sources from other parts of the Islamic world.

Sources

Native sources

In the Kanem–Bornu Empire, keeping records of the royal lineage was the task of specialists, usually part of the royal court and in service of the mai. Records were passed down both through documents, written in Arabic by court scribes, and in the form of oral history. The history of the mais was referred to as the diwan in its written form and as the girgam in its orally recited form. Girgam is also commonly used as a name for both versions. Another type of important source document are mahrams, grants given by mais to their officials and subjects.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “List of mais of Kanem–Bornu” is wikimedia list article. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through List, mais and Kanem, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1846—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, List, mais and Kanem is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “wikimedia list article” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q134996027. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1846.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of mais of Kanem–Bornu”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of mais of Kanem–Bornu primary sources, List of mais of Kanem–Bornu archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of mais of Kanem–Bornu”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “List of mais of Kanem–Bornu” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.