Saulcy, Switzerland
municipality in the canton of Jura in Switzerland
Saulcy (French pronunciation: [so(l)si]; Frainc-Comtou: Sâci) is a municipality in the district of Delémont in the canton of Jura in Switzerland.
History
Saulcy is first mentioned in 1327 as Sacis.
Geography
Saulcy has an area of 7.86 km2 (3.03 sq mi). Of this area, 3.67 km2 (1.42 mi2) or 46.7% is used for agricultural purposes, while 3.98 km2 (1.54 mi2) or 50.6% is forested. Of the rest of the land, 0.26 km2 (0.10 mi2) or 3.3% is settled (buildings or roads).
Of the built up area, housing and buildings made up 1.7% and transportation infrastructure made up 1.7%. Out of the forested land, 46.8% of the total land area is heavily forested and 3.8% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 6.9% is used for growing crops and 22.8% is pastures and 16.8% is used for alpine pastures.
The municipality is located in the Delemont district. It consists of the village of Saulcy and the hamlet of La Racine.
“Saulcy, Switzerland” enters the record as municipality in the canton of Jura in Switzerland. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Saulcy, Switzerland and municipality can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Saulcy, Switzerland” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Saulcy, Switzerland and municipality provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q68083. Authority coordinates are 47.300, 7.150. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1327.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Saulcy, Switzerland”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Saulcy, Switzerland primary sources, Saulcy, Switzerland archive and Saulcy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Saulcy, Switzerland”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Saulcy, Switzerland” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.