CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Sasha Swire

British journalist and author

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ76239946
Source-derived summary

Alexandra Patrusha Mina Swire, Baroness Swire (née Nott; born 18 January 1963), commonly known as Sasha Swire, is an English author and journalist, and the wife of the former Conservative Party Minister of State Hugo Swire, Baron Swire.

She is the writer of the 2020 memoir Diary of an MP's Wife.

Background

Descended from Devon gentry, Alexandra Nott is the only daughter of Sir John Nott, former Member of Parliament for St Ives and Secretary of State for Defence under Margaret Thatcher during the Falklands War, and his wife Miloska Vlahovič, daughter of Yugoslav resistance leader Lujo Vlahovič, of Slovenian extraction.

Her elder and younger brothers, Julian and William Nott, both attended Eton College, while she was educated at Cranborne Chase School. She then pursued further studies at St Martin's School of Art, where she was a contemporary of the fashion designer John Galliano.

Swire trained as a journalist and has a background in local journalism.

She sought selection for the Teignbridge parliamentary candidacy of 2005 won by Stanley Johnson. David Cameron wanted her to stand for a parliamentary seat for the Conservative Party again in 2009.

She voted Remain in the 2016 EU referendum.

Diaries

Swire's book, Diary of an MP's Wife: Inside and Outside Power, was published on 24 September 2020.

Editorial summary

“Sasha Swire” enters the record as british journalist and author. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sasha, Swire and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963, 2020, 2005, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1963-01-18. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sasha, Swire and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sasha Swire” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sasha, Swire and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q76239946. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1963, 2020, 2005 and 2009.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sasha Swire”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sasha Swire primary sources, Sasha Swire archive and Sasha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sasha Swire”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sasha Swire” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.