Sarah Chronis
Dutch actress
Sarah Chronis (born 27 August 1986) is a Dutch actress. She is known for her role as Eva Persijn in the television series Onderweg naar morgen.
Career
Chronis played roles in the television series Rozengeur & Wodka Lime (2004), Kinderen geen bezwaar (2011), Seinpost Den Haag (2011), Flikken Maastricht (2014), Meiden van de Herengracht (2015), Centraal Medisch Centrum (2017) and Nieuwe buren (2019).
Chronis plays a lead role in the 2014 film Reckless directed by Joram Lürsen.
In 2019, Chronis participated in the reality television show Wie is de Mol?, correctly identifying the mole (Merel Westrik) and winning the show. In the same year, she made her debut in the long-running soap opera Goede tijden, slechte tijden in the 6000th episode.
Chronis appears in the film BOEIEN! directed by Bob Wilbers, in the 2023 film Fijn weekend directed by Jon Karthaus, and in the 2023 Netflix film Oei, ik groei!.
She appeared in an episode of the 2025 anniversary season of the television show Wie is de Mol?.
Filmography
Film
Reckless (2014)
BOEIEN!
“Sarah Chronis” enters the record as dutch actress. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sarah, Chronis and Dutch can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Sarah Chronis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sarah, Chronis and Dutch provides the most credible route into that argument.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2599181. VIAF identifies the subject as 317167625. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1986, 2004, 2011 and 2014.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Sarah Chronis”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Sarah Chronis primary sources, Sarah Chronis archive and Sarah research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sarah Chronis”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Sarah Chronis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.