CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sanga Puitã

place in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 8, 2018
Entity authorityQ10367641 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sanga Puitã is a district of the Brazilian municipality of Ponta Porã, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. The city lies on the border with the Paraguayan city of Zanja Pytá in the Amambay Department.

Editorial summary

“Sanga Puitã” enters the record as place in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sanga, Puitã and place can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 37-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sanga, Puitã and place.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sanga Puitã” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sanga, Puitã and place provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 8, 2018. The linked authority identifier is Q10367641. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sanga Puitã”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sanga Puitã primary sources, Sanga Puitã archive and Sanga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sanga Puitã”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sanga Puitã” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.