CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sandwich-structured composite

special class of composite materials; fabricated by attaching two thin but stiff skins to a lightweight but thick core

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ620529
Source-derived summary

In materials science, a sandwich-structured composite is a special class of composite material that is fabricated by attaching two thin-but-stiff skins to a lightweight-but-thick core. The core material is normally of low strength, but its greater thickness provides the sandwich composite with high bending stiffness with overall low density.

Open- and closed-cell-structured foams like polyethersulfone, polyvinylchloride, polyurethane, polyethylene, or polystyrene foams, balsa wood, syntactic foams, and honeycombs are commonly used core materials. Sometimes, the honeycomb structure is filled with other foams for added strength. Open- and closed-cell metal foams can also be used as core materials.

Laminates of glass- or carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastics or thermoset polymers (unsaturated polyesters, epoxies, etc.) are widely used as skin materials. Sheet metal is also used as skin material in some cases.

The core is bonded to the skins with an adhesive or, with metal components, by brazing.

History

A summary of the important developments in sandwich structures is given below.

230 BCE – Archimedes describes the laws of levers and a way to calculate density.

Editorial summary

“Sandwich-structured composite” enters the record as special class of composite materials; fabricated by attaching two thin but stiff skins to a lightweight but thick core. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sandwich-structured, composite and special can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 170-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sandwich-structured, composite and special.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sandwich-structured composite” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sandwich-structured, composite and special provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q620529. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sandwich-structured composite”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sandwich-structured composite primary sources, Sandwich-structured composite archive and Sandwich-structured research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sandwich-structured composite”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sandwich-structured composite” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.