CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre

Tibetan Buddhist monastery in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ1270200 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre is a Tibetan Buddhist complex at Eskdalemuir, Scotland. It is associated with the Karma Kagyu school.

The centre includes one of the first Tibetan temples to be constructed in Western Europe, a large stupa, and accommodation for those taking a range of courses on Buddhism, meditation, spiritual development and art.

Rokpa Trust

Samye Ling is owned and run by Rokpa Trust, a charity registered in Scotland (SC038628) and incorporated as a company limited by guarantee in England and Wales (03260031). Rokpa Trust operates the Holy Isle Centre for World Peace and Health and the Samye Dzong centres. The charity's website, samyeling.org, carries the Samye Ling name, is published by Rokpa Trust, and covers the charity's governance and its other centres.

The Johnstone House Trust ceased to exist in 1995 and the centre now describes itself as part of the ROKPA Trust, whose objectives are

to promote Buddhism and to foster non-sectarian inter-religious dialogue and understanding. To provide medical care and therapy. To provide education. To relieve poverty.

Editorial summary

“Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre” enters the record as tibetan Buddhist monastery in Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Kagyu, Samye and Ling can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1967. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Kagyu, Samye and Ling.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Kagyu, Samye and Ling provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1270200. Authority coordinates are 55.288, -3.186. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1995.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre primary sources, Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre archive and Kagyu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.