Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm
concept in mathematics

In mathematics, the Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm efficiently computes the characteristic polynomial of an
n
×
n
{\displaystyle n\times n}
matrix whose entries may be elements of any unital commutative ring. Unlike the Faddeev–LeVerrier algorithm, it performs no divisions, so may be applied to a wider range of algebraic structures.
Description of the algorithm
The Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm applied to a matrix
A
{\displaystyle A}
produces a vector whose entries are the coefficient of the characteristic polynomial of
A
{\displaystyle A}
. It computes this coefficients vector recursively as the product of a Toeplitz matrix and the coefficients vector an
(
n
−
1
)
×
(
n
−
1
)
{\displaystyle (n-1)\times (n-1)}
principal submatrix.
Let
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
be an
n
×
n
{\displaystyle n\times n}
matrix partitioned so that
A
0
=
[
a
1
,
1
R
C
A
1
]
{\displaystyle A_{0}=\left[{\begin{array}{c|c}a_{1,1}&R\\\hline C&A_{1}\end{array}}\right]}
The first principal submatrix of
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
is the
(
n
−
1
)
×
(
n
−
1
)
{\displaystyle (n-1)\times (n-1)}
matrix
A
1
{\displaystyle A_{1}}
. Associate with
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
the
(
n
+
1
)
×
n
{\displaystyle (n+1)\times n}
Toeplitz matrix
T
0
{\displaystyle T_{0}}
defined by
T
0
=
[
1
−
a
1
,
1
]
{\displaystyle T_{0}=\left[{\begin{array}{c}1\\-a_{1,1}\end{array}}\right]}
if
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
is
1
×
1
{\displaystyle 1\times 1}
,
T
0
=
[
1
0
−
a
1
,
1
1
−
R
C
−
a
1
,
1
]
{\displaystyle T_{0}=\left[{\begin{array}{c c}1&0\\-a_{1,1}&1\\-RC&-a_{1,1}\end{array}}\right]}
if
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
is
2
×
2
{\displaystyle 2\times 2}
,
and in general
T
0
=
[
1
0
0
0
⋯
−
a
1
,
1
1
0
0
⋯
−
R
C
−
a
1
,
1
1
0
⋯
−
R
A
1
C
−
R
C
−
a
1
,
1
1
⋯
−
R
A
1
2
C
−
R
A
1
C
−
R
C
−
a
1
,
1
⋯
⋮
⋮
⋮
⋮
⋱
]
{\displaystyle T_{0}=\left[{\begin{array}{c c c c c}1&0&0&0&\cdots \\-a_{1,1}&1&0&0&\cdots \\-RC&-a_{1,1}&1&0&\cdots \\-RA_{1}C&-RC&-a_{1,1}&1&\cdots \\-RA_{1}^{2}C&-RA_{1}C&-RC&-a_{1,1}&\cdots \\\vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\ddots \end{array}}\right]}
That is, all super diagonals of
T
0
{\displaystyle T_{0}}
consist of zeros, the main diagonal consists of ones, the first subdiagonal consists of
−
a
1
,
1
{\displaystyle -a_{1,1}}
and the
k
{\displaystyle k}
th subdiagonal
consists of
−
R
A
1
k
−
2
C
{\displaystyle -RA_{1}^{k-2}C}
.
The algorithm is then applied recursively to
A
1
{\displaystyle A_{1}}
, producing the Toeplitz matrix
T
1
{\displaystyle T_{1}}
times the characteristic polynomial of
A
2
{\displaystyle A_{2}}
, etc. Finally, the characteristic polynomial of the
1
×
1
{\displaystyle 1\times 1}
matrix
A
n
−
1
{\displaystyle A_{n-1}}
is simply
T
n
−
1
{\displaystyle T_{n-1}}
. The Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm then states that the vector
v
{\displaystyle v}
defined by
v
=
T
0
T
1
T
2
⋯
T
n
−
1
{\displaystyle v=T_{0}T_{1}T_{2}\cdots T_{n-1}}
contains the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of
A
0
{\displaystyle A_{0}}
.
Because each of the
T
i
{\displaystyle T_{i}}
may be computed independently, the algorithm is highly parallelizable.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm” is concept in mathematics. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Samuelson, Berkowitz and algorithm, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “concept in mathematics” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1526404. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm primary sources, Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm archive and Samuelson research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Samuelson–Berkowitz algorithm” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.