CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Sámuel Jósika

Hungarian politician (1848–1923)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ7665249
Source-derived summary

Baron Sámuel (Samu) Jósika de Branyicska (23 August 1848 – 4 June 1923) was a Hungarian politician, who served as Minister besides the King between 1895 and 1898. After the Treaty of Trianon he was the leader of the Hungarian minority's main party (Országos Magyar Párt) in Transylvania after it became part of the Kingdom of Romania.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Sámuel Jósika” is hungarian politician (1848–1923). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Sámuel, Jósika and Hungarian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1848, 1923, 1895, 1898—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1848-08-23. For this dossier, Sámuel, Jósika and Hungarian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hungarian politician (1848–1923)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7665249. VIAF identifies the subject as 49146998485118941663. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1848, 1923, 1895 and 1898.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sámuel Jósika”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sámuel Jósika primary sources, Sámuel Jósika archive and Sámuel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sámuel Jósika”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sámuel Jósika” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.