Salaries in Iran
Open-knowledge reference entry
Salaries in Iran were considerably devaluated in recent years the as Iran struggles with economic sanctions and rising inflation rates. The result is a decrease in the purchasing power of salaries. The result is that more and more citizens cannot provide themselves with the most basic needs as were defined by the government.
Salaries and gender wage gap
In 2010, the average net salary in Iran was $708.33.
As of 2025, the average salary in Iran is approximately 5,376,003,000 IRR per year, with most salaries falling from 1,356,003,000 IRR to 12,000,000,000 IRR annually.
Gender based pay gaps exist in Iran, with males earning 11–12% more than females. For example, male physicists earn approximately 1,235,999,900 IRR, while females earn 1,113,601,700 IRR—an 11% gap. Male administrative law judges earn, on average, 1,619,999,400 IRR, compared to 1,452,001,600 IRR for females—showing a 12% gap. Male economists earn 934,798,400 IRR, while women earn 842,398,300 IRR, reflecting an 11% difference. Male office clerks earn around 248,398,700 IRR, while their female counterparts earn 224,398,200 IRR, showing a similar 11% gap.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Salaries in Iran” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Salaries, Iran and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q132200845. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 2025.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Salaries in Iran”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Salaries in Iran primary sources, Salaries in Iran archive and Salaries research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Salaries in Iran”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Salaries in Iran” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.