Sajah
7th-century Arab Christian self-declared prophetess

Sajah bint Al-Harith ibn Suwayd al-Tamimi (Arabic: سجاح بنت الحارث بن سويد التميمية, fl. 598-675 CE) from the tribe of Banu Tamim, was an Arab Christian known for claiming to be a prophet in late antique Arabia. She is the only known female prophetess of pre-Islamic Arabia, and her career has been compared with the general trend of Prophet claimants on the Arabian Peninsula in the sixth and seventh centuries.
She was protected by her tribe at first; then causing a split within the Arab tribes and finally defended by Banu Hanifa. Sajah was one of a series of people (including her future husband) to claim to be prophets in the aftermath of the death of Muhammad. She is said to have converted to Islam after the rise of Muhammad and died as a Muslim.
Biography
Her full nisba was Sijah bint al-Harith bin Suwaid at-Tamimi. According to Muhammad Suhail Taqu̅sh, Arab culture and Turkic history professor of Imam al-Awza’i University, Sajah was a Christian who also worked as a shaman. Her father was a chief of Banu Yarbu, a clan of Banu Tamim, which has dominant Christians populace after their frequent contact with the Christianity influences from the Euphrates Region. Her mother came from Bani Taghlib from the Lower Mesopotamia region.
“Sajah” enters the record as 7th-century Arab Christian self-declared prophetess. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sajah, 7th-century and Arab can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Sajah” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sajah, 7th-century and Arab provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2624795. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Sajah”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Sajah primary sources, Sajah archive and Sajah research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sajah”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Sajah” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.