CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Anolis schwartzi

species of reptile

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ3006436 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anolis schwartzi, known commonly as Saint Kitts Bank bush anole, Statia Bank bush anole or Schwartz's anole, is a species of lizard in the family Dactyloidae. The species is found on the islands of Sint Eustatius, Saint Kitts, and Nevis.

Taxonomy

The first description of Anolis schwartzi was published in 1972 by James Draper Lazell Jr., who classified it as a subspecies of Anolis wattsi: Anolis wattsi schwartzi. The specific name schwartzi was chosen to honour American herpetologist Albert Schwartz. Jonathan Roughgarden was the first person to recognize the anole as its own species, doing so in 1987, with later authors being in disagreement over whether or not to recognize it as a species or subspecies.

Distribution and habitat

Anolis schwartzi is endemic to the Saint Kitts Bank, present on the islands of Sint Eustatius, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and is the only anole present on these islands other than anolis bimaculatus. Of these two species of anole, Anolis schwartzi alone is prealent in the rainforests of these islands, which are usually found at higher elevations, while both species can be found in lowland areas. In lowlands, Anolis schwartzi lives in wet, shady areas.

Description and behaviour

The maximum recorded snout-vent length of Anolis schwartzi sits at 53 mm (2.1 in) for males and at 46 mm (1.8 in) for females. Despite the fact that anolis schwartzi is significantly smaller than anolis bimaculatus, which can reach snout-vent lengths of over 100 mm (3.9 in), it is known to contest the larger anole species for lowland territory, and occasionally come out as the victor.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Anolis schwartzi” is species of reptile. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Anolis, schwartzi and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Anolis, schwartzi and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of reptile” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3006436. The first chronological checks are 1972 and 1987.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anolis schwartzi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anolis schwartzi primary sources, Anolis schwartzi archive and Anolis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anolis schwartzi”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anolis schwartzi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.