CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Safety and liveness properties

properties of an execution of a computer program

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ114637252
Source-derived summary

Properties of an execution of a computer program—particularly for concurrent and distributed systems—have long been formulated by giving safety properties ("bad things don't happen") and liveness properties ("good things do happen").

A program is totally correct with respect to a precondition

P

{\displaystyle P}

and postcondition

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

if any execution started in a state satisfying

P

{\displaystyle P}

terminates in a state satisfying

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

. Total correctness is a conjunction of a safety property and a liveness property:

The safety property prohibits these "bad things": executions that start in a state satisfying

P

{\displaystyle P}

and terminate in a final state that does not satisfy

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

. For a program

C

{\displaystyle C}

, this safety property is usually written using the Hoare triple

{

P

}

C

{

Q

}

{\displaystyle \{P\}C\{Q\}}

.

The liveness property, the "good thing", is that execution that starts in a state satisfying

P

{\displaystyle P}

terminates.

Note that a bad thing is discrete, since it happens at a particular place during execution.

A "good thing" need not be discrete, but the liveness property of termination is discrete.

Formal definitions that were ultimately proposed for safety properties and liveness properties demonstrated that this decomposition is not only intuitively appealing but is also complete: all properties of an execution are a conjunction of safety and liveness properties. Moreover, undertaking the decomposition can be helpful, because the formal definitions enable a proof that different methods must be used for verifying safety properties versus for verifying liveness properties.

Safety

A safety property proscribes discrete bad things from occurring during an execution.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Safety and liveness properties” as properties of an execution of a computer program. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 270-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Safety, liveness and properties can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as properties of an execution of a computer program. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q114637252. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Safety and liveness properties”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Safety and liveness properties primary sources, Safety and liveness properties archive and Safety research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Safety and liveness properties”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Safety and liveness properties” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.