CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mark Saccomanno

American baseball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ6769560 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mark Edison Saccomanno (born April 30, 1980) is an American former professional baseball first baseman. He played in Major League Baseball (MLB) for the Houston Astros in 2008. He represented Italy in the 2006 World Baseball Classic.

Career

Amateur

At 17, Saccomanno was awarded the Klein Forest High School Golden Glove award. He was also selected to the 17-and-under AAU National All-Tournament Team. At 18, was named Second-Team All-District 16-5A as a shortstop and received the National Scholar Athlete Award. He played college baseball for Baylor University.

Professional

Saccomanno was selected in the 23rd round (689th overall) of the 2003 Major League Baseball draft by the Houston Astros.

Saccomanno was called up to the majors by the Houston Astros on September 8, 2008, and hit a home run on the first pitch of his first major league at-bat, pinch hit for pitcher Alberto Árias, against Pirates' pitcher Ian Snell. A free agent at the end of the season, he re-signed with the Astros on January 5, 2009 to a minor league contract that included an invitation to spring training as a non-roster invitee.

Editorial summary

“Mark Saccomanno” enters the record as american baseball player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mark, Saccomanno and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1980, 2008, 2006, 2003—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1980-04-30. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mark, Saccomanno and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mark Saccomanno” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mark, Saccomanno and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6769560. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1980, 2008, 2006 and 2003.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mark Saccomanno”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mark Saccomanno primary sources, Mark Saccomanno archive and Mark research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mark Saccomanno”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mark Saccomanno” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.