CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad

newspaper

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ1767681
Source-derived summary

Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad is a local newspaper in Sarpsborg, Norway. It is published six days a week. The chief editor is Bernt Frode Lyngstad.

It was established in 1929, after the demise of Østfold Arbeiderblad, and was affiliated with the Labour Party. However, the newspaper ultimately became non-partisan. It was stopped between October 1940 and May 1945, during the German occupation of Norway.

It has a circulation of 13,595, of whom 13,345 are subscribers. It is published by the company Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad AS, which is owned 100% by A-pressen.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad” is newspaper. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Sarpsborg, Arbeiderblad and newspaper, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1929, 1940, 1945—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1929-10-01. For this dossier, Sarpsborg, Arbeiderblad and newspaper is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “newspaper” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1767681. VIAF identifies the subject as 8038148997658759870007. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1929, 1940 and 1945.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad primary sources, Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad archive and Sarpsborg research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.