CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center

military unit

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ7889522
Source-derived summary

The United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center (STTC) provides the United States Department of Defense and United States Department of Homeland Security with applied research, helping to develop simulation technologies, build on current simulation knowledge, and understand system of systems environments where human, agent, and teams are involved. The STTC is located in Orlando, Florida.

History

The STTC traces its lineage to 1983, when the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA) started work on a technology to network a large number of manned simulators, emulators, and semi-automated force simulations to form a Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) of a battlefield. DARPA ran the project from 1983 to 1989, and convinced the Army to use DIS technology.

The Army Science Board studied the technology in 1991, and found a central management structure was necessary to ensure an integrated system. The board's recommendation resulted in the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) and U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC) sharing management responsibility for the new system. TRADOC designated its National Simulation Center (NSC) as its functional manager for controlling the requirements process. AMC created a new major subordinate command in 1992—the U.S. Army Simulation, Training and Instrumentation Command (STRICOM) (its current name being PEO STRI), headquartered in Orlando, Florida—to serve as the technical manager for system execution. STRICOM consisted of two existing organizations, the Project Manager Training Devices (PM TRADE) and Project Manager Instrumentation, Targets and Threat Simulators (PM ITTS), plus two new organizations, the Project Manager for Combined Arms Tactical Training (PM CATT) and the Project Manager for Distributed Interactive Simulation (PM DIS).

In the 1990s, the technology base group of STRICOM formed the Technology Development Center (TDC) and moved to a separate building from the rest of STRICOM. One of TDC's major efforts was the University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) at the University of Southern California.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center” as military unit. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around United, States and Army.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983, 1989, 1991, 1992—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with United, States and Army providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center”, the useful work is to connect “military unit” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7889522. Authority coordinates are 28.588, -81.197. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983, 1989, 1991 and 1992.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center primary sources, United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center archive and United research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from United States Army Simulation and Training Technology Center” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.