TS Pretoria
Passenger ship (1936–1987)
TS Pretoria was a ship that had a long and varied career as first a German cargo liner, then a U-boat depot ship, hospital ship, British troop ship, Muslim pilgrim ship and finally an Indonesian naval accommodation ship.
Description
The ship's registered length was 547 ft (166.7 m) long, her beam was 72.5 ft (22.1 m), her depth was 31.5 ft (9.6 m), and her draught was 26 ft (7.9 m). As built, she was assessed at 16,662 GRT. After her 1958 refit, she was assessed as 17,891 GRT.
As built, the ship was powered by six steam turbines, rated at a total of 14,000 shp. These were fed by a number of small, high-pressure Benson boilers. The turbines drove twin screws and gave her a speed of 18 knots (33 km/h). In 1949 the Benson boilers were replaced by convention boilers, made by Foster Wheeler, operating at 500 pounds per square inch (34 bar). In 1973, she was re-engined, being fitted with diesel engines.
As built, the ship had berths for 152 first class and 338 second class passengers. In 1949 she was converted to a troopship, with berths for 1,491 troops. In 1959 she was refitted to carry 106 first class and 2,000 pilgrim class passengers.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “TS Pretoria” as passenger ship (1936–1987). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as passenger ship (1936–1987). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7671801. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1958, 1949, 1973 and 1959.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “TS Pretoria”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow TS Pretoria primary sources, TS Pretoria archive and Pretoria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “TS Pretoria”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “TS Pretoria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.