CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Progabide

pharmaceutical drug

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ426524 ↗
Source-derived summary

Progabide, sold under the brand name Gabrene, is a GABA receptor agonist which is used in the treatment of epilepsy. It is an analogue of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and acts both via a metabolite and as a prodrug of GABA, in turn behaving as an agonist of the GABA receptors.

Uses

Progabide was approved in France for either monotherapy or adjunctive use in the treatment of epilepsy—specifically, generalized tonic–clonic, myoclonic, partial, and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome seizures—in both children and adults... it was completely withdrawn in France in 1999 because of its high Hepatotoxicity

Side effects

Side effects of progabide include drowsiness, insomnia, and nausea. Less frequent side effects have been reported to include diaphoresis, malaise, gastralgia, somnolence, pruritus, urticaria, darkening of urine, and elevated liver enzymes. The drug has been associated with liver toxicity.

Pharmacology

Progabide acts as a non-selective GABA receptor agonist, including of both the GABAA and GABAB receptors. It is a GABA receptor agonist itself but also metabolizes into the more potent GABA receptor agonist progabide acid (SL-75.102). In addition, progabide and progabide acid are metabolized into gabamide and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which act as GABA receptor agonists as well. Progabide crosses the blood–brain barrier, whereas gabamide and GABA do not, but progabide form gabamide and GABA within the brain.

Editorial summary

“Progabide” enters the record as pharmaceutical drug. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Progabide, pharmaceutical and drug can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Progabide, pharmaceutical and drug.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Progabide” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Progabide, pharmaceutical and drug provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q426524. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Progabide”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Progabide primary sources, Progabide archive and Progabide research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Progabide”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Progabide” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.