SAR (clade)
supergroup of eukaryotes

SAR is a highly diverse clade of eukaryotes, often considered a supergroup, that includes stramenopiles (heterokonts), alveolates, and rhizarians. It is a node-based taxon (under the Sar name), including all descendants of the three groups' last common ancestor, and comprises most of the now-rejected Chromalveolata. Their sister group might be telonemids, with which they would make up the TSAR clade, but this grouping has been challenged.
Etymology
The name SAR is an acronym derived from the first letters of its three constituent clades (Stramenophiles, Alveolata, Rhizaria); it has been alternatively spelled RAS. The term Harosa (at the subkingdom level) has also been used, with Stramenopiles replaced by its synonym Heterokonta in this variant of the acronym.
History of discovery
Before the discovery of the SAR supergroup, stramenopiles and alveolates were classified in the supergroup Chromalveolata alongside haptophytes and cryptomonads, being believed to have acquired plastids through secondary endosymbiosis of red algae through a common ancestor. Meanwhile, Rhizaria was traditionally considered to be a separate supergroup. More recent phylogenetic studies confirmed that stramenopiles and alveolates diverged with rhizarians as part of the SAR lineage. This clade has been found by later phylogenomic studies to be robustly characterized compared to other supergroups.
This group excludes haptophytes and cryptomonads, hypothesized to have acquired plastids in separate endosymbiosis events, leading Okamoto et al. (2009) to propose the clade Hacrobia to accommodate them.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “SAR (clade)” is supergroup of eukaryotes. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through clade, supergroup and eukaryotes, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “supergroup of eukaryotes” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137323. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “SAR (clade)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow SAR (clade) primary sources, SAR (clade) archive and clade research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “SAR (clade)”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “SAR (clade)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.