CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

SAFE For Kids Act

New York law

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ130755650
Source-derived summary

The SAFE For Kids Act, also known as Stop Addictive Feed Exploration for Kids Act or S7694A, is an American law in the state of New York that requires parental consent for anyone under 18 as well as estimation of their age to have an "addictive" feed. It was later signed on June 20, 2024, by New Yorks Governor and goes into effect 180 days after being signed.

Progression

The bill had zero votes against it in its rule committee vote or its floor vote and was promoted by the governor.

Summary

The bill requires addictive social media platforms which is defined as any website, online service, online application, or mobile application, that offers or provides users an addictive feed as a significant part of the services provided by such website, online service, online application, or mobile application. These platforms will have to use a method to determine someone's age and if they are under 18 years of age to get parental consent before giving them an "addictive" feed. It also prohibits these platforms from sending notifications to anyone under 18 between 12:00 am - 6:00 am Eastern Standard Time without parental consent. The rulemaking authority and enforcement is done by the Attorney General of New York and it will take effect and be enforced within 180 days of it being signed. Noncompliance with the law will incur a $5,000 fine per violation.

Promotion

Aside from the Governor of New York the bill has been promoted by Common Sense Media.

Criticism

The bill has been criticized by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and NetChoice because the law requires age verification, which they assert strips away privacy and chills free speech.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “SAFE For Kids Act” is new York law. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through SAFE, Kids and York, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, SAFE, Kids and York is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “new York law” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q130755650. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “SAFE For Kids Act”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow SAFE For Kids Act primary sources, SAFE For Kids Act archive and SAFE research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “SAFE For Kids Act”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from SAFE For Kids Act” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.