Rutland (Vermont Senate district)
a three-seat constituency in the Vermont Senate
The Rutland district is one of 16 districts of the Vermont Senate. The current district plan is included in the redistricting and reapportionment plan developed by the Vermont General Assembly following the 2020 U.S. census, which applies to legislatures elected in 2022, 2024, 2026, 2028, and 2030.
The Rutland district includes all of Rutland County except the town of Mount Holly, which is in the Windsor district.
District senators
As of 2022
Brian Collamore, Republican
Dave Weeks, Republican
Terry Williams, Republican
2005-2006
Hull P. Maynard, Jr., Republican
Kevin J. Mullin, Republican
Wendy L. Wilton, Republican
2007-2008
Bill Carris, Democrat
Hull P. Maynard, Jr., Republican
Kevin J. Mullin, Republican
As of 2017
Brian Collamore, Republican
Peg Flory, Republican
Kevin J. Mullin, Republican
Candidates for 2022
The following information was obtained from the Vermont Secretary of State website.
“Rutland (Vermont Senate district)” enters the record as a three-seat constituency in the Vermont Senate. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Rutland, Vermont and Senate can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Rutland (Vermont Senate district)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Rutland, Vermont and Senate provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q56240566. Authority coordinates are 43.610, -73.050. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2022, 2024 and 2026.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rutland (Vermont Senate district)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rutland (Vermont Senate district) primary sources, Rutland (Vermont Senate district) archive and Rutland research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rutland (Vermont Senate district)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rutland (Vermont Senate district)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.