CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Achondrostoma arcasii

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ591612
Source-derived summary

Achondrostoma arcasii, termed the bermejuela, is a species of freshwater ray-finned fish belonging to the family Leuciscidae, which includes the daces. Eurasian minnows and related fishes. This species is endemic to the northern Iberian Peninsula.

Taxonomy

Achondrostoma arcasii was first formally described as Leucos arcasii in 1866 by the Austrian ichthyologist Franz Steindachner with its type locality given as the Ebro River at Logroño in La Rioja and the Queiles River at Tudela in Navarre, both in Spain. It is now classified as a valid species in the genus Achondrostoma within the subfamily Leuciscinae of the family Leuciscidae. The genus was proposed in 2007 for three species which were split from Chondrostoma on the basis of genetic evidence with this species designated as the type species. Further genetic studies revealed that the taxon originally regarded as A. arcasiwas polyphyletic and that the fishes in the west of Spain were three different species A. garzonorum, A. asturicense and A. numantinum.

Etymology

Achondrostoma arcasii belongs to the genus Achondrostoma, this name places the prefix a-, meaning "without", in front of the genus name Chondrostoma, which is a combination of chondros, a word meaning "gristle" or "cartilage", with stoma, meaning "mouth". This is an allusion to the lack of the horny plates in the mouths of these fishes, which are present in Chondrostoma . The specific name, arcasii, honours Laureano Pérez Arcas, a Spanish zoologist who shared specimens with Steindachner.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Achondrostoma arcasii” is species of fish. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Achondrostoma, arcasii and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1866, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Achondrostoma, arcasii and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of fish” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q591612. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1866 and 2007.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Achondrostoma arcasii”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Achondrostoma arcasii primary sources, Achondrostoma arcasii archive and Achondrostoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Achondrostoma arcasii”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Achondrostoma arcasii” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.