Isotopes of ruthenium
Second most hazardous gaseous isotopes after iodine-131 in case of release by a nuclear accident
Naturally occurring ruthenium (44Ru) is composed of seven stable isotopes: 96, 98-102, 104 (of which the first and last may in the future be found radioactive). Additionally, 27 synthetic radioactive isotopes have been discovered. Of these radioisotopes, the most stable are 106Ru with a half-life of 371.8 days or 1.018 years, 103Ru, with a half-life of 39.245 days, and 97Ru with a half-life of 2.837 days.
The other known isotopes run from 87Ru to 120Ru, and most of these have half-lives that are less than five minutes, except 94Ru (51.8 minutes), 95Ru (1.607 hours), and 105Ru (4.44 hours).
The primary decay mode before the most abundant isotope, 102Ru, is electron capture to isotopes of technetium, and after beta emission to isotopes of rhodium. Double beta decay is the allowed mode for the two observationally stable isotopes: 96Ru and 104Ru.
Because of the volatility of ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4), ruthenium isotopes with relatively short half-life are considered the next most hazardous airborne isotopes, after iodine-131, in case of release by a nuclear accident. The two most important isotopes of ruthenium so released are those with the longest half-life: 103Ru 106Ru.
List of isotopes
Alleged ruthenium-106 leak
In September 2017 an estimated amount of 100 to 300 TBq (0.3 to 1 g) of 106Ru was released in Russia, probably in the Ural region. It was, after ruling out release from a reentering satellite, concluded that the source was either in nuclear fuel cycle facilities or radioactive source production.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Isotopes of ruthenium” is second most hazardous gaseous isotopes after iodine-131 in case of release by a nuclear accident. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Isotopes, ruthenium and Second, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “second most hazardous gaseous isotopes after iodine-131 in case of release by a nuclear accident” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1374122. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of ruthenium”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Isotopes of ruthenium primary sources, Isotopes of ruthenium archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of ruthenium”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Isotopes of ruthenium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.