CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Russian Direct Investment Fund

Fund established by the Russian government in June 2011

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 3, 2026
Entity authoritySource title only
Source-derived summary

The Russian Direct Investment Fund is Russia's sovereign wealth fund established in 2011 by the Russian government with the stated goal to make investments in companies of high-growth sectors of the Russian economy.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Russian Direct Investment Fund” is fund established by the Russian government in June 2011. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Russian, Direct and Investment, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Russian, Direct and Investment is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “fund established by the Russian government in June 2011” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2026. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Russian Direct Investment Fund”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Russian Direct Investment Fund primary sources, Russian Direct Investment Fund archive and Russian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Russian Direct Investment Fund”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Russian Direct Investment Fund” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.